The collective mutual agreed Termination (CMAT= Rupture conventionnelle collective) eventually borrows the individual conventional termination (rupture conventionnelle) only the name.

If the individual version constitutes an amicable way of terminating the contract of employment, negotiated directly between the employee concerned and his employer, the collective version falls within the framework of a collective agreement concluded between the employer and the unions  and on the basis of which employees can apply to join the scheme.

Another notable difference is due to the tax system of the indemnities paid in this context.

Indeed, by introducing the CMAT, the legislature intended to give it a tax and social system that is even more favourable than that of individual termination benefits.

Click on the link below to read all the documents

https://blogavocat.fr/space/frederic.chhum/content/french-labour-law-rupture-conventionnelle-collective-rcc-or-rupture-conventionnelle-rc-what-differences-terms-taxation-and-social-contribution_

Frédéric CHHUM, Avocats à la Cour (Paris et Nantes)

. Paris : 4 rue Bayard 75008 Paris - Tel: 01 42 56 03 00 ou 01 42 89 24 48
. Nantes : 41, Quai de la Fosse 44000 Nantes -  Tel: 02 28 44 26 44

e-mail : chhum@chhum-avocats.com

Blog : www.chhum-avocats.fr

http://twitter.com/#!/fchhum